Right down to the stolen opening segment, the American What Not to Wear is really just a horribly pale imitation of the British version.
And it really comes down to the hosts, Clinton Kelly and Stacy London.
They are the epitome of the camera-hungry, smug American host; they are the Alex McLeod/Paige Davis to Susannah and Trinny's Carol Smillie. They seem to think that they, not the woman being made over, are the stars, and they can't stop preening and performing for the camera. I don't think I'm being naive--I know that Susannah and Trinny are probably just as self-promotional as Clinton and Stacy--they have a book, after all--but the fact is, they know how to present themselves on the show so that they don't look like self-obsessed primadonnas. Whereas Susannah and Trinny actually look like they make an effort to make the woman feel attractive, Clinton and Stacy would probably drop their tiaras and run if the cameras weren't there.
And what's worse, they're really not very funny or bitchy--they're just fussy, and that's fucking boring. I know that people often complain about the Queer Eye Fab 5 being nothing but gay stereotypes, but really Queer Eye shows much more respect for the Fab 5 than WNTW has for its "fashion experts," Clinton in particular. It feels like Clinton's every move has been scripted to portray the fussy-but-sterile gay male without any of the individuality or personality that the Fab 5 bring to Queer Eye.
Postscript: I know What Not to Wear has been out for a while on TLC, and even been through several incarnations of hosts, but we just got TLC, so we're catching up.
Thing is, Ben, Wayne - Clinton's predecessor - was much worse. He brought to the show long hair and overuse of the word, "Hello!"
In other words, you need to seek out these older episodes.
Posted by: Paul | December 17, 2003 at 09:13 AM
I think the problem with the show is that they don't know how to dress anybody. All the styles they put on their "victims" are just horrid. The show is like a train wreck. They need to fire both host in the US and start again with stlyists that have real style.
Posted by: eve | January 24, 2004 at 10:13 AM
i used to feel like you did, for a long long time in fact. but the more i watch the american version, the more i almost think i like it better than the british original. i must preface my comments by telling you how my blood ran cold when i first saw the american version, and saw the opening and how they stole the theme music blah blah blah (really, it seems like tlc finds it impossible to come up with any original tv shows, but that's another tangent all together). i grew, after many viewings, to like wayne and stacy, and was pretty sad not to see wayne anymore. especially since i heard he got a much-needed haircut. but i like the fact that the american show is an hour, and you get to see so much more (hair, makeup) than you do on the too-short half-hour brit version. plus, i think overall the people look better after the american version than the british one. but it's all subjective at the end of the day. maybe i just think they look so much better than most people in my area (d.c.)...but i'm glad that tlc wanted to put out a what not to wear. at least they want people to look better, y'know? (sorry this is so lengthy!)
Posted by: megan | February 22, 2004 at 02:03 PM
I completely agree with you about the American WNTW compared to the British one. Trinny and Susannah don't come off as corny, camera-hungry hosts like Clint and Stacey do. T&S seem to give better fashion advice and are able to show the women how bad they're dressing.
Also, the advice that C&S give is seems to be more oriented toward the latest fashions, rather than what looks good on the individual. T&S emphasize curves and shape more than what's in and what's out.
I think if C&S just stop talking to the camera (literally) then the American WNTW would be much better. Then they should learn how to dress individual women.
Posted by: Jessica | March 18, 2004 at 12:58 AM
I live in the Caribbean and I have seen both the British version and the American version and I must say the American version is MUCH MUCH better than the British version. The end results on TLC's WNTW beats the Brits version.
Posted by: Annalisa | April 24, 2004 at 07:58 PM
Hi all,
My name is Jacquelene, I'm a New York City reporter doing an article on all the TV makeover shows. If you are willing to answer some questions about What Not to Wear, The Swan or Extreme Makeover, please email me asap.
Thanks,
Jacquelene
Posted by: Jacquelene | April 26, 2004 at 10:56 AM
Hey,
How do you think 'What Not to Wear' is affecting the way that we perceive eachother? Do you now see people on the street and say "she needs to go on the show."?
Also, what do you think of the makeover shows that encorporate plastic surgery? Are they crazy?
Finally, why are you fascinated with 'What not to Wear?'
Thanks for your responses!
Jacquelene
Posted by: Jacquelene | May 06, 2004 at 12:54 PM